Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 801 - 820
of 36,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Haaland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
Still, Wayfair does enhance state power, which is always good way to push back on an overweening federal regulation. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:13 pm
" Assuming, arguendo, the Tax Court judges do exercise "the judicial power of the United States" (and not executive power), Congress impermissibly granted to the President a cross-branch power to remove these judges. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Then in 1994, in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:54 am
Purchasing Power, LLC, 12-cv-22800-UU (S.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
From United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:57 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Patchak appealed to the SCOTUS arguing that the Act usurped the power of the judiciary to decide his case. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
The supporting parent does not have veto power over the choice of an educational institution, nor is the child necessarily limited to an in-state institution. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently filed a memorandum decision regarding an appeal in the case of State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
For example, in Transpacific Steel LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Kam-Almaz v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:16 am
The Ninth Circuit Blog has a discussion of the en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
United States Trustee v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:50 am
The Upper Tribunal had a broad discretion with regard to the control of the evidence before it and had, within its case management powers, the power to waive non-compliance with a practice direction or a rule. [read post]
