Search for: "State v. Soules" Results 801 - 812 of 812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
In both cases, the state creates a monopoly right over something otherwise available to the masses (especially as the business asset with trade marks is protectable by passing off, so the registration system is a state-awarded bonus created by impinging on public freedom). [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:41 pm
All said and done judicial review is the heart and soul of our Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
As it is, the company has left a group of potential friends and allies in a state of mutinous distress over copyright law. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm
He chose a position between the liberal Democrats and George Wallace, supporting Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
  But my curmudgeonly fears were laid to rest earlier this week when the Supreme Court decided Carey v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 4:10 am
There's also a scholarly (as usual) sequel to Chris Wadlow's earlier article on the harmonisation of unfair competition, not to mention Part 1 of a state-of-the-art grey goods and trade mark law feature by leading Scottish practitioner Gill Grassie.For good measure, there are case notes on three of the year's biggest legal cases: the US patent injunction decision in eBay v MercExchange and the UK Da Vinci and O2/3 (Bubbles) battles. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 7:07 am
Maddox, G-d rest her soul, got away with $50,000 in goods and services that Mather provided. [read post]