Search for: "State v. Sparks" Results 801 - 820 of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am by Norman L. Eisen
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
  As the organizers no doubt had predicted, the angles adopted by the presenters were diverse, which sparked a fruitful and vibrant discussion, both amongst the panel members and with the broader audience. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm by Ronald Mann
Unlike patents, which require a notable step of inventiveness, the level of expressive spark necessary for copyright protection is quite low. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
Texas “caused lower courts to treat claims that the Constitution requires states to license same-sex marriages with great seriousness,” Breyer’s dissent “should spark the same vigorous debate among lower-court judges” with regard to the death penalty. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Miller v Peake, heard 18 to 20 November 2024 (HHJ Parkes KC) RTM v Bonne Terre Limited and another, heard 11 to 15 November 2024 (Collins Rice J ) Vince v Bailey, heard 11-12 November 2024 (Pepperall J) Vince v Tice and Vince v Staines heard 11 November 2024 (Pepperall J) Salman Iqbal v Geo TV Limited, heard 5 November 2024 (Underhill LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) Secretary of State… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The Judges’ Bill “decisively reoriented the institutional function of the Court toward the management of the law and its reception by the general legal public,” Post explains, and as jurisprudential ideas, controversial issues, and the Court’s membership evolved over the coming decades they sparked ever sharper divisions among the justices. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Randy Barnett
”But the Constitution includes the amendment process of Article V, which has already been used to alter the scheme by allowing an income tax and eliminating the power of state legislatures to select U.S. senators.Add to this, judicial construction of the Constitution vastly expanding federal power in just the past 60 years. [read post]