Search for: "State v. Strickland" Results 801 - 820 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:20 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name:  Ken v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
New Jersey claiming a jury, not a judge should have decided if she should be sentenced to death, and the other a Strickland v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am by SHG
 On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:33 am by Adam Schlossman
  On the merits, it seemed that Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor were open to Richter’s ineffective assistance claim under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
ADA pleading – more than boilerplate is required Strickland v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am by Alex Phipps
The court noted the applicable two-part test under Strickland v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence,… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
The facts in State v. [read post]