Search for: "State v. Wallace" Results 801 - 820 of 1,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 12:44 pm
Message by BSALegal.org on 5/3/2010 EST Boy Scouts of America is grateful that the Supreme Court of the United States considered hearing an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm by Garth Snider
See http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/160714657_1.html In Wallace v Pyro Mining, 789 F.Supp. 867 (W.D.Ky. 1990). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) bars defendant's claim because his assertion that he did not oppose being taken into custody contradicts his conviction for resisting arrest is reversed as, Wallace v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:56 am by Marcia Oddi
This ILB entry from Feb. 26, 2010 included quotes from a story by Jeff Neumeyer, posted Feb. 25th on the... [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:09 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Soost expands the law on Wallace damages, and states that Wallace damages can also be awarded for other objectively provable losses, foreseeable by both parties at the time of entering into the employment contract, such as the loss of a book of business, if such losses arise from the unfair and insensitive conduct of the employer at the time of termination.Soost is referenced in Elgert v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am by Howard Friedman
Gregory Wallace, Justifying Religious Freedom: The Western Tradition, 114 Penn State Law Review 485-570 (2009).Shannon Gilreath, Not a Moral Issue: Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty (Reviewing Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty, edited by Douglas Laycock, Anthony R. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Kevin
Wenner, 351 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2003) (burglary is not a crime of violence); id. at 977 (Wallace, J., dissenting) (is too); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am by Rick Hills
(Note that, to my knowledge, the Cato Institute filed no amicus brief in Kansas v. [read post]