Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
NC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
Stone Cellars v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Today, in the case Cochran v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm
It is a story of fits and starts that provides a fascinating chronicle of the history of wine in the United States told through the lens of the law. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 12:16 pm
Tech Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
”Meyer Intellectual Properties Limited et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
It was suggested that the state legislature was likely wrong to have imagined that the instances of drunk driving on Garden State roads would have been reduced by essentially "immunizing" beer-, wine- and liquor-sales establishments from lawsuits filed by drivers arrested for DWI-related traffic offenses. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:51 pm
NMC states: Stating this aloud is not to say that anyone who spoke did anything inappropriate– people were properly playing their respective roles, and none of this demonstrates that Karen Irby is lying. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:28 am
The examiner said "no", citing Article 7(1)(j) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation which states that ‘The following shall not be registered: … (j) trade marks for wines which contain or consist of a geographical indication identifying wines … with respect to such wines … not having that origin. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
The first—Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Oliver, No. 08-15738 In an action by a Michigan winery claiming that certain provisions of Arizona's statutory scheme regulating the direct shipment of wine from wineries — whether located in-state or out-of-state — to Arizona consumers violated the dormant Commerce Clause, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where Arizona's statutory exceptions to its three-tier distribution system, which treated similarly situated in-state and… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
State Immunity in IPR Cases. 4. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm
In Budde v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:55 am
Lagunitas does so to express their dismay and confusion about the current state of world affairs. [read post]
