Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 801 - 820
of 40,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2007, 7:25 am
"This Court reasoned that the plain meaning of the jury's words, "during the sex act," leads one to conclude that the reference was to the act of intercourse. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
” (I’m skipping the obvious trademarkability problems with a descriptive word like this). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am
In regards with Ms Mirga, Neuberger stated that the right under art 21.1 is qualified by the words “subject to limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and by the measures adopted to give them effect”. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
It certifies the issue to the State Court of Appeals for a definitive answer.The case is Schoenefeld v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
STATE V. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
Jakes premised the majority of his submission on the Diamond v Diehr decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
In its recent judgment in Mulla v State of UP, the Supreme Court has continued with the trend of emphasising the extremely limited scope of the rarest of rare doctrine first formulated in Bachan Singh.This blog has noted Justice Sinha's contribution to the death penalty debate, where he repeatedly emphasised the fundamental precondition in Bachan Singh---that rarest of rare case will be one where 'the alternative option [of life imprisonment] is unquestionably… [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
We are examining the recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm
People v Navarrette Court Discusses the Interpretation of the Word Operation in Section 600(2)(a) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law The defendant was charged with a class B misdemeanor, attempted leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, under section 110.00 Penal Law and section 600 (2) (a)Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
The pleadings are almost word-for-word replicas of the pleadings in those consolidated cases. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:51 pm
In Appendix B to his opinion for the Court today in Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is New York State Thruway Authority v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
Stern v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
In Serra v. [read post]
