Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Strickland, 640 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1981); In re Horob, 54 B.R. 693, 696 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 388, the Court may appropriately decline to mandate the order of decision that the lower courts must follow, see, e.g., Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:04 pm
He was sentenced to death and, after having a habeas petition denied by the Virginia Supreme Court for failing to satisfy either prong of Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
  First, the State argues that the Ninth Circuit exceeded its authority by extending the Court's decision in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Correll Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied the prejudice standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence,… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
Autumn Fox and Doug Thompson won today in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:58 am
From a recent Dallas Court of Appeals Case We examine ineffective assistance of counsel claims by the standard set out in Strickland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Strickland ((07-689), but found the inquiry confusing, frustrating and inconclusive. [read post]