Search for: "Sweet v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
It received a plug in Experience Hendrix LLC and another v Times Newspapers Ltd, [2010] EWHC 1986 (Ch), decided earlier this week in the Chancery Division for England and Wales by Sir William Blackburne. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
25 May 2024, 10:39 am
” Sarkissian v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm
(See, e.g., the 2 Live Crew case, Campbell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
” FCC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
A patent attorney with Beetz & Partner, Munich, he also has a very sweet smile (left). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
And the present ideological form of international human rights is not, as Moyn sees it, the gradual evolution of Enlightenment tenets down to today in sweet progression, but is largely a reaction to, and an attempt to regroup, after the failures of the utopian social visions of the post-war period, especially anti-colonialism and Marxism. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
The feds claim that it's not a sweet deal. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am
App. 3d 340 (2004)); (2) the payor is attempting to evade a support obligation ( Sweet, 316 Ill. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Additional onion types possibly implicated in this recall included jumbo, colossal, medium, summer, and sweet onions. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
