Search for: "Sweet v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
It received a plug in Experience Hendrix LLC and another v Times Newspapers Ltd, [2010] EWHC 1986 (Ch), decided earlier this week in the Chancery Division for England and Wales by Sir William Blackburne. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
 A patent attorney with Beetz & Partner, Munich, he also has a very sweet smile (left). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
And the present ideological form of international human rights is not, as Moyn sees it, the gradual evolution of Enlightenment tenets down to today in sweet progression, but is largely a reaction to, and an attempt to regroup, after the failures of the utopian social visions of the post-war period, especially anti-colonialism and Marxism. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am by Russell Knight
App. 3d 340 (2004)); (2) the payor is attempting to evade a support obligation ( Sweet, 316 Ill. [read post]