Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc"
Results 801 - 820
of 12,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On Wednesday 22nd March the Court will hand-down judgment in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2023] UKSC 12. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:48 pm
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
See, e.g., Virginia Soc'y for Human Life, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
Qualcomm Inc., 21 F.4th 784, 797 (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:54 am
Ah, how I wish courts would apply the same scrutiny to trademark harm stories.FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
Rausch v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 17/03/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm
" I would also direct the drafters to Strine's opinion in HMG/Courtland Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 1:42 pm
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Good morning and thank you, [Columbia Law School] Dean [Gillian] Lester, for the introduction. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
Coakley’s NDA and Certificate of Engagement In 2018, before filming began on Runt, Coakley entered into a Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with the producer and financier of the film, Virtuoso 2, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
(Citing and discussing at length, Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Association (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, and Ventura Foothill Neighbors v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
S., at 485–486; alterations omitted); Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:02 am
Sephora USA Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 10/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution… [read post]
