Search for: "TURNER v. TURNER" Results 801 - 820 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
Second, if it's content-neutral, does it pass the judicial test set forth in Supreme Court cases decided in the 1990s pertaining to the relationship between cable and broadcast television, Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Because review of NAC’s liability insurance policies to determine their potential applicability to the judgment in the underlying action fell outside the scope of HSE’s engagement, the court properly granted HSE’s motion with respect to the professional negligence/legal malpractice cause of action against HSE insofar as asserted by NAC (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
Two
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm by Jon Sands
Two AFPD wins:U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
” Anderson, South Carolina’s Independent Mail looks ahead to the oral argument in Turner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing detriment to the… [read post]