Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 18,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 11:53 am by Gene Takagi
Another likely reason for the increased use of section 501(c) organizations for political campaign activity is the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:26 am by Kevin Smith and Ryan Duffy
On April 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a long-standing precedent when it held in Greathouse v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm by David Munkittrick
Earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Track municipal spending, the state's 160,000 contracts, billions in state payments and public authority data. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
The case itself notes:Classen owns the following United States Patent Numbers: (1) 6,420,139 ("the 139 patent"); (2) 6,638,739 ("the 739 patent"); (3) 5,728,385 ("the 385 patent "); and (4) 5,723,283 ("the 283 patent") (collectively, "the patents in suit"). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:04 am by Lawrence Solum
  As a unanimous United States Supreme Court recognized only seven years ago in the privacy case National Archives and Records Administration v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Jeff Kosseff
” If enacted, such a legislative reform would bring the statute into alignment with the 2010 decision of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:05 pm
This Court applied Bulova Watch in International Café where we held that “the Lanham Act confers jurisdiction over extraterritorial disputes involving trademark infringement and unfair competition when: 1) Defendant is a United States corporation; 2) the foreign activity had substantial effects in the United States; and 3) exercising jurisdiction would not interfere with the sovereignty of another nation. [read post]
The post United States Supreme Court Decision Explains that Public School Students Have Broader Free Speech Protections When Off Campus appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post United States Supreme Court Decision Explains that Public School Students Have Broader Free Speech Protections When Off Campus appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post United States Supreme Court Decision Explains that Public School Students Have Broader Free Speech Protections When Off Campus appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]