Search for: "Thomas v. Thomas"
Results 801 - 820
of 19,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:40 pm
Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court, and was joined by all but Justice Thomas (who concurred in the judgment) and Chief Justice Roberts (who took no part in the decision). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:42 pm
Thomas (09-5201). [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:05 am
From Capitol Records Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:57 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Gee v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
In Thomas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
In Thoma v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:35 am
See Donovan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 8:59 pm
Contact Thomas James at the Law Office of Tom James.The post Corbello v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
Neither Walters nor Thomas was arrested that evening.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Brackeen and on May 25 in Justice Thomas's concurrence in Sackett v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:55 am
The landmark civil rights case of Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
Truman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record… [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:55 pm
Thomas University - School of Law) has posted Thompson V. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
Alexander Vindman (Ret.)John Eastman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:06 am
Thomas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am
In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held that while, under the reasoning of Stern v. [read post]
