Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 801 - 820
of 8,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 6:57 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 am
Here’s the latest on the fight in Beaumont, Texas between a colorful plaintiffs attorney and the newspaper owned by the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm
TiVo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
As a result, in Texas, as is true in many other states, legislation has been passed to protect stores and businesses from theft by their customers and clients called the “Shopkeeper’s Privilege” law. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
Chesapeake has asked the Texas Supreme Court to hear its appeal of Chesapeake v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:10 pm
The U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” The policy at the center of the case, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:10 am
In Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:49 am
Texas, 2007 U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
Texas, 2000 WL 1835396 *2 (Texas Court of Appeals 2000) (`officer's affidavit stated appellant's windshield had a crack in it. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 7:47 pm
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 395--416 (2012). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:13 pm
State district judges in Louisiana and Texas, for example, run for office in partisan elections. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), appears to render these South Carolina criminal statutes unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
At bottom: Cindy V. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
Following up on Saturday's op-ed by Steve Johnson on Thursday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
On September 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the U.S. [read post]
