Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm
Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, supra; Powell v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Please send us any items for inclusion in the next round up to inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:39 pm
Here is the abstract: Twenty-five years after it was decided, a legal scholar can still use McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
We’ve now spent more time discussing it than either of us feel necessary, so let’s move on. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
Palmer’s comprehensive English translation of colonial Louisiana’s Code Noir of 1724 will be particularly useful to researchers. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
For more info about us, click here. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
ANTHONY POWELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
First, let us start with [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm
App. 250, 257, 532 S.E.2d 908, 912 (2000), quoted in Powell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 9:04 am
US v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor relied on Powell’s diversity rationale when deciding Grutter v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm
(David Bernstein) My contribution to Scotusblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:54 pm
Enter Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Bollinger will soon be upon us. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:46 am
Currently in the news thanks to Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:36 am
Powell, but the defendant’s appeal from that issue is hampered by the fact that transcript of the required hearing on nondisclosure was provided. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
In US v. [read post]
