Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 12, 2008 Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:50 am
" Vilar - Early Production of 3500 Material Denied United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
United States, 61 Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:54 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Techdirt), User generated font community: (Techdirt), Copyright has stretched so far that it has broken – discussion of R Fleischer’s article in ‘Future of copyright’ series: (Techdirt), Antigua doesn’t see settlement with US over WTO plan to let it ignore US copyrights: (Techdirt) Events 16 June: USPTO town hall meeting on industrial designs - Alexandria: (Daily Dose of IP), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
The case was originally filed in state court, but was removed by the defendants to federal district court under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Arnold District Court Decision: Recoiling Against Romm In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:45 pm
App. at 87; United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:48 am
FISA AND PREEMPTION OF THE STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE Under FISA, 50 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
