Search for: "United States v. Abed" Results 801 - 820 of 821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeClient Is Uncooperative But Lawyer Must ContinueRepresentation; Problems Not Personal to Counsel United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
It was unreasonable for them to believe, however ‘honest' such a belief, that the term ‘use in commerce' on a trademark application in the United States meant anything other than use of the mark in commerce in or with the United States, or even that use in commerce in Australia was the legal equivalent of use in commerce in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:36 am
Nino Franco Spumanti S.R.L., Cancellation No. 92043953 [Petition to cancel a registration for RUSTICO for wines and sparkling wines, on the ground of fraud, alleging that Respondent "has only ever used the mark on sparkling wines in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/23/07 referred to transportationLAW / CORRECTNSA3294 Gunther (MS) -- Authorizes the employment of state and local work release inmates by not-for-profit organizations and public service projectsSUMM : Amd SS851 & 870, Cor L Authorizes the employment of state and local work release inmates by not-for-profit organizations and public service projects. 01/24/07 referred to correctionLAW / CORRECTNSA3450 Koon (MS) -- Requires electronic… [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
Ryan U.S DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Denies Bulk of Prisoner's Bid to Restructure $926,649 in Restitution of Wire, Bank Fraud United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
A prima facie doomed appeal is likely to be rejected on Thursday 30 November when the CFI gives judgment in Case T-43/05 Camper, S.L. v OHIM, JC AB. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
It is an excellent primer on the interplay (or lack thereof) of copyright and fashion in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
Groumoutis believed that "use" meant "made," he could not have believed that the marks were used in the United States because Opposer's clothing items were not made in the United States. [read post]