Search for: "United States v. Head" Results 801 - 820 of 6,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 This group includes individuals within the United States and many foreign countries. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:29 am by Dan Ernst
  From that medieval artifact, visitors turn to a history of rights in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
  When a constitutional amendment is ratified by the requisite number of states, federal law tasks the United States Archivist (the head of the National Archives) with certifying and publishing the amendment. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
  When a constitutional amendment is ratified by the requisite number of states, federal law tasks the United States Archivist (the head of the National Archives) with certifying and publishing the amendment. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm by John Inazu
Three weeks ago, Stanley Fish's essay "The First Amendment and Kittens" reflected on the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
The United States is the world leader in AI research and development (R&D) and deployment. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Gilbert Hyatt's suit against the Board is one "commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State"—to which "[t]he Judicial power of the United States," including the power vested in this Court, "shall not be construed to extend. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am by SHG
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Sentenced to six months house arrest and a fine of $10,000.United States v. [read post]