Search for: "United States v. Jacobs" Results 801 - 820 of 878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Gina Gkoulgkountina
Two federal district judges issued opposing rulings after considering challenges to the plan of the United States DOGE Service and others (collectively referred to as DOGE) to access agency systems. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am by MBettman
United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am by Patricia Hughes
On March 22nd, a different kind of Presidential Memorandum, “Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court”, directed the Attorney General “to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States or in matters before executive departments and agencies of the United States”, to refer for disciplinary action lawyers whose conduct in Federal Court… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]