Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 801 - 820 of 5,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
” To show that “Smith knowingly avoided an obligation to the United States,” the Court instructed, means that “Smith knew he had an obligation to the United States and knew that he was avoiding it. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
” To show that “Smith knowingly avoided an obligation to the United States,” the Court instructed, means that “Smith knew he had an obligation to the United States and knew that he was avoiding it. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 8:53 am by Steven Cohen
Halverson – United States District Court – Western District of Missouri – August 8th, 2018) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States, the United States Supreme Court recently held that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to make factual findings that raise the mandatory minimum sentence for an offense. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
On June 4 I was in Washington and took the oath to join the bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 7:31 am by Steven Cohen
SMITH CORPORATION – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – August 30th, 2018) involves a product liability claim. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple case is Mr Justice Marcus Smith, whose reputation extends not only to patent but also competition law: he is the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CATribunal, or just CAT) of the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in United States v. [read post]