Search for: "United States v. State of Alaska"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am
EPA released the third edition of a report, Climate Change Indicators in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
The Plant Protection Act of 2000 (PPA) directs the Secretary of Agriculture (or his designee—in this case, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)) to promulgate regulations to prevent the “introduction of plant pests into the United States or the dissemination of plant pests within the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The case before the Justices does not involve any claims for the environmental damage; that was resolved in earlier actions by the federal and Alaska state governments. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:28 am
(Note: While I certainly hope that EPA is correct in saying that it has no impact, the United States Supreme Court might disagree with that assessment as it did in last term’s case of Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
This is the key part of how the court resolved the ex post facto claim in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 9:36 am
In the United States, we deputize plaintiffs' lawyers and juries to supplement government safety regulators and law enforcement officials. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Trump restricted travel to the United States from foreign nationals who have recently been in Europe. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
