Search for: "United States v. State of Washington" Results 801 - 820 of 9,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 9:36 am by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html This case was decided on 3/19/19: Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:36 am by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html This case was decided on 3/19/19: Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
A lawsuit was filed yesterday in a Washington federal district court challenging the Oct. 24 Executive Order that resumes the admission of refugees to the United States, but with increased vetting of those from 11 countries. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 1:22 pm by Franklin Graves
District Court in Washington, D.C. naming as defendants both the United States Copyright Office (USCO) and Shira Perlmutter, in her official capacity as Register of Copyrights and Director of the USCO. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by The Editors
Resolving a current split amongst multiple federal circuits, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  However, some in Washington are fighting to keep the United States among a small handful of nations — including North Korea and China — that allow elective abortions after 20 weeks. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
., a Washington based corporation and owner/operator of multiple commercial trawling vessels, pleaded guilty in a Cordova Court yesterday to illegal fishing with Non-Pelagic Trawl gear in state waters that were closed to the use of trawl gear. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Gore (George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming, 2013) on SSRN. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
Nevada, 504 U.S. ____, ____ (1992) (slip. op., at 7); Washington v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Brett Trout
Bilski I wrote previously about my uneasiness with the United States Supreme Court’s apparent unfamiliarity with current technology. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:12 am
In DUI case, majority concludes that machine-generated data concerning positive test in a blood sample was not a statement of the lab technicians and therefore was not a hearsay statement, since it was not made by a person but a machine analyzing the sample; no Confrontation Clause issues were raised, in United States v. [read post]