Search for: "United States v. Woods" Results 801 - 820 of 1,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
"The IPKat will continue to monitor the situation, rather suspecting that trade mark expert, American sports-lover and blog team member Neil will feel tempted to write something on it when the moment is ripe.Another curiosity from the United States may be perused in this Daily Mail article, "New Jersey sues Florida pizza shop 1,300 miles away because logo is 'too similar' to Garden State Parkway", via a tip-off from Chris… [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Those of us in the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar would like an answer too, please. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
  These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Federalist Society Review,  Jonathan Wood and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on Christie v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:00 am by Robert Brammer
Margaret Wood, Senior Legal Research Specialist – Margaret chose Bradshaw v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm by Andrew Raff
United States and United States v. [read post]