Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 801 - 820 of 941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Kappos (SCt 08-964) Anyone with a lick of sense knew that Bilski wasn't going to get his patent claims granted. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
However, you might be able to convince the court, even if it doesn’t grant the TRO, that it’s a close call deserving an expedited schedule. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
Turns out there was, as we all suspected, someone named Wells – in fact, John W. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
We granted certiorari to decide how a bankruptcy court should calculate a debtor’s “projected disposable income. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
It appears that Waterstones decided, in the end, that they would stock the book – after being offered an indemnity by Mr Dale’s company, but that W H Smith decided not to stock it. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:19 pm
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm by Bexis
In light of this, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment on [plaintiff’s] unjust-enrichment claim.Baycol Products Litigation, 596 F.3d 884, 892 (8th Cir. 2010) (applying California law) (citations omitted) (emphasis added).The same result was reached in Prohias v. [read post]