Search for: "WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 801 - 820
of 3,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
In Cavazos, California again seeks review of the Ninth Circuit’s grant of habeas relief under Jackson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
Pinholster v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:44 am
Watkins Jr. and William F. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
That case is United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
By William W. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
Consumer Can Pursue Claim That “Greenlist” Label Was MisleadingThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A class action complaint alleging that a “Greenlist” label used by household cleaning products manufacturer S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
In a recent ruling, Judge William H. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
Kirk v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Edward Obayashi, deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County Sheriff's Office and Dr. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
Hearst v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Rubin has practiced labor, employment, and appellate law since clerking for Justice William J. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:13 pm
Barnard (William & Mary); Chris Brummer (Georgetown); Deborah A. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/williams-v-san-francisco-complaintLink to video statement of attorneys and client:https://youtu.be/8gYd9oZzdHgCase pages: EFF case page ACLU case pageFor more on police spying tech: eff.org/issues/street-level-surveillance aclunc.org/issue/technology-civil-liberties Contact: SairaHussainStaff Attorneysaira@eff.org press@aclunc.org [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Hart and William W. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
By William W. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “SIGNIFICANT ROADBLOCKS FOR PLAINTIFFS IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAWSUIT: California Judge Dismisses Most Claims Against AI Developers in Andersen v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm
Purchase in Reliance on False Label Is “Loss of Money” in CaliforniaThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Consumers who can truthfully allege they were deceived by a product’s label into spending money to purchase the product, and would not have purchased it otherwise, have “lost money or property” and have standing to sue under the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), as… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
By William W. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am
Hall – holding that states have no sovereign immunity from suit in the courts of their sister states – as it appears poised to do this Term in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
