Search for: "WILLIAMS v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 13,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Darrell West was joined by John Villasenor and Mark MacCarthy to discuss Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Karen Greenberg
” He had come to the United States in 1974 on a student visa, had graduated from the New York Institute of Technology, held a permanent resident visa, and traveled frequently between Pakistan and the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm by Scott Bomboy
That small group includes George Washington’s chief of staff, a future United States president, and a controversial New York state politician. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Of course, a state legislature may dictate the terms in which the duress defense may be raised. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Amusement Park Regulation’s Bumpy Ride August 31, 2022 | William Tunney A patchwork of state and private industry oversight leaves room for federal intervention. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]