Search for: "Walkes v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 7,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2020, 2:07 pm
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion today in Energy Transfer Partners, L.P v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:31 pm
They asked Acker to recuse himself from the Renfroe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
Detailed designs of the Saturn V rocket no longer exist, Drake said. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
Electronic Arts Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 9:37 am
In a 2014 case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 12:35 pm
Google Spain v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
In the case of Yockey v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 9:11 pm
The Judgment by the European Court of Human Rights in Burmych and Others v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
NPR reports on the hearing:Wendy Vitter, nominated by President Trump for a federal judgeship, tried Wednesday to walk back several controversial comments she made about abortion and birth control.Questioned by skeptical Democrats at her confirmation hearing, she maintained she could "put aside" her long-held "pro-life" advocacy, and as a judge enforce the Supreme Court's Roe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Additional Resources: Carlson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
While he looked for it, he did not see Slow Sally walking through the crosswalk. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:14 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
Edward Wasik v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
