Search for: "Washington v. Lee"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Lee, 16-969 Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
Todd Virginia Military Institute , Washington and Lee University – Department of Economics , Washington and Lee University – Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics and Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisDate Posted: March 14, 2014Last Revised: May 28, 2014 Working Paper Series81 downloads 9. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
Todd Virginia Military Institute , Washington and Lee University – Department of Economics , Washington and Lee University – Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics and Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisDate Posted: March 14, 2014Last Revised: May 28, 2014 Working Paper Series81 downloads 9. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Washington University)Levy David M. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Rev __ (2018 Forthcoming), Eumi Lee, University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Lee, 15-789, fourth relist, is a state-on-top habeas case hailing from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Washington and that petitioner must bear the affirmative burden of proving that he did not consent to the biased juror; (2) whether a court may presume a strategic purpose from a silent record regarding why counsel made decisions that are on their face objectively unreasonable; (3) whether the court below had the obligation to decide for itself which of two equally compelling interpretations of Florida v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Lee, 15-789, is a state-on-top habeas case out of the you-know-where Circuit (no, not that one; cut it out already!). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:09 pm
Waxman, Washington, D.C., attorney and former U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 10:27 am
(See Lee v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
The privacy v security fallacy. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
The Supreme Court press corps is not invited to those events, but we did have our annual group outing to the Washington Nationals baseball game this past Saturday. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In Lee v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
George Washington University (?) [read post]
