Search for: "White v State" Results 801 - 820 of 12,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
  First: In White v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(Sherman, p. 79) The law was the most famous ban on miscegenation in the United States, and was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967, in Loving v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
As chief justice of the United States, Chase is chiefly remembered for his nationalistic opinion in Texas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Reprinted here, the Southern Manifesto formally stated opposition to the landmark United State Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
"The Ninth Circuit agrees with the district court that these statistics and underlying data state a valid Fair Housing Act claim. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that the White House communicated with Facebook and Twitter about the general topic does not transform into state action their decisions about one post or tweet….even if the White House had specifically communicated with these companies about Hart’s post or tweet, their enforcement of its policy as to that post or tweet would still not be joint action. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Ezra Rosser
Whiting, the Article explains why state immigration laws fail to satisfy two necessary conditions of effective experimentation: internalization and replication. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]