Search for: "Will v. Hughes" Results 801 - 820 of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm by Danielle D'Onfro
The Supreme Court showed no great interest in the bankruptcy problem at the heart of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
  In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am by James Eckert
  The notice of appeal, which would have been too late if the clock had started the day the court gave copies to the parties, was not untimely.In People v Hughes (#184 11/19/13) the Court of Appeals rejected defendant's argument that, while punishing the defendant for CPW was okay, punishing it as a C felony violated the second amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm by The Blog Team
Correction of judgment and restitution: “There is something very wrong with this picture – so wrong Stevie Wonder could see the flaw from a phone booth in Chicago:” United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 10 June 2021 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the “Sun only” claim brought by Sir Simon Hughes. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Catherine Rose
  Supreme Court judgment In a judgment delivered by Lord Hughes, the Supreme Court unanimously refused Mr Nunn’s appeal. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in the Hughes v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
Dismissal for excessive absence found an appropriate disciplinary penaltyMcKinnon v North Bellmore UFSD, 273 AD2d 240According the Appellate Division, Second Department, dismissing an employee who is guilty of excessive absence is consistent with the Pell standard (Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222).The North Bellmore Union Free School district dismissed Hugh McKinnon, a teacher, after he had been found guilty of charges of (1) failing to comply with the district has… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]