Search for: "YORK v. PAGE"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 7:51 am
Epic Antitrust Judge Doubts Apple Expert’s Amex ComparisonLaw360 – May 12, 2021 (subscription required) A California federal judge presiding over Epic’s high-stakes antitrust trial appeared skeptical Wednesday of a professor’s testimony that Apple’s anti-steering provisions are akin to restrictions upheld by the high court in Ohio v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Strandburg, New York University School of Law. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
Facebook “never applied the newsworthiness allowance to content posted by the Trump Facebook page or lnstagram account. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Hold the Front Page published a comment on the Millett v Corbyn case by Sam Brookman. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Hak v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:13 am
Charles Bertini v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:18 am
A lawyer would never spout a legal citation during a client meeting (“Well, according to Brown v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:14 am
However, in Bates v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:14 am
However, in Bates v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Castrejon copied Bacon's real Facebook (FB) page in order to make a fraudulent account in her name. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 7:16 pm
Delaware will retain jurisdiction over a dissolution claim notwithstanding a mandatory New York forum selection clause, according to the recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion in Seokoh, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:05 pm
Nunes v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 1:06 pm
Winn-Dixie Stores and Robles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
One is New York’s common-law dissolution doctrine as ratified by the Court of Appeals’ 1963 ruling in Leibert v Clapp, authorizing courts to adjudicate a minority shareholder’s non-statutory cause of action for judicial dissolution where the majority shareholders “have so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are disqualified from exercising the exclusive discretion and the dissolution power given to them by… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm
The law firm’s two-page report summary can be found here. [read post]
