Search for: "YOUNGER v. THE STATE"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 9:29 am
The plaintiff in the case of Nielsen v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Craig v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 2:53 am
According to court records in Nestor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:59 am
C.N. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:06 am
Bradley v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
A parent with a carefully balanced budget based on the Guidelines may find it difficult to make ends meet when suddenly faced with a large car insurance bill.In a recent New Jersey Trial Court opinion, Fichter v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:18 am
The employer’s motion was granted (Kuebler v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am
The younger bus driver who was not fired was not as culpable because the driver wasn’t tasked with watching over students while driving (Bailey v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am
Supreme Court devastated the strengths of the Voting Rights Act in the Supreme Court case of Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:02 am
State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:02 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
His father seems to have belonged to the lowest rank of the gentry; at any rate, he had only enough property to endow his eldest son, John, so that Thomas and his younger brother were destined for the church. [read post]
