Search for: "e-IT Professionals Corp."
Results 801 - 820
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 6:49 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:14 pm
See Cintas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:39 pm
Although it's not a given that the Rules of Professional Conduct would apply to an argument before the Federal Reserve, let's assume that, by way of Rule 3.9, all the basic duties of merit, candor and fairness apply. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
NSSTA Board member James E. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The FTC standard of competent and reliable scientific evidence has been defined in FTC case law as "tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
Warner Music Group Corp. is creating a service called Choruss, which will seek to cut deals for blanket downloading licenses to universities, and, eventually, individual users. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See Pony Express Courier Corp. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:02 am
[Note: If you were subscribed to the e-mailed TaxQuips, you'd be getting other exciting news and tips by e-mail, that never appear on the site. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
A couple of cases we've posted about recently started us thinking - a dangerous turn of events, we know. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Medford, MA; Timothy Labelle, President) All Rite Door Corp. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Cal. 1996); Professionals & Patients for Customized Care v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:17 am
Houbigant, Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, 303 AD2d 92, 94-95 [2003] [accountant's audit "was a task performed pursuant to professional standards applicable in the context of any audit, and was not undertaken pursuant to any duty owed toward [plaintiff]"); LaSalle Natl. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(E. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
" She then attributed the attachment of the wrong note to an e-filing error and explained that since no one reviewed the claims after they were e-filed there was no way this error could have been discovered (unless, of course, some one took the time to reviewed the filed claims). [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:22 am
In that case, I urge you to get professional help! [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:24 am
Gregory Dearlove was the engagement partner in charge of the 2000 audit of Adelphia Communications Corp. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:26 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
E. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
This conclusion is consistent with the only other case we have found where on similar facts an attempt was made to reach the jury without expert testimony that the warning was inadequate.And Dion agreed:[W]e find that in the instant case the trial court properly concluded that expert testimony was necessary. [read post]
