Search for: "preservation historical sites" Results 801 - 820 of 1,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 2:00 am by Brian Kaszuba
On November 18, 2014, the Landmarks Preservation Commission considered a proposal to construct a new building at 112 Atlantic Avenue, at the corner of Henry Street, in Brooklyn’s Cobble Hill Historic District. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:42 am by Ken White
Few people were upset by that — you didn't hear a lot of "OMG people are focused on appearance rather than on this historic event, how terrible. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:42 am by Ken White
Few people were upset by that — you didn't hear a lot of "OMG people are focused on appearance rather than on this historic event, how terrible. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Recognizing a common goal and obligation to consider the impacts of agency actions on historic properties of traditional cultural and religious importance to tribes, on December 5, 2012, the Departments of Defense, the Interior, Agriculture, Energy, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to improve the protection of and Indian access to sacred sites through interagency coordination and collaboration. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:35 pm by Susan Schneider
 The article, Tribes Say CalTrans Illegally Destroying Historical Sites for Bypass, written by Marc Dadagan, reveals a "documented violation of the National Historic Preservation Act regulations meant to protect tribal heritage and resources. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
And it realizes that it would prefer to be the messenger of such information than other critical sites as a way to stop the hemorrhaging. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm by Kerry Shapiro
Fourth, for projects that require a federal permit, applicants should bear in mind that compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act may also be required. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:42 am by Kerry Shapiro
Fourth, for projects that require a federal permit, applicants should bear in mind that compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act may also be required. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 3:30 pm by Peter Bright
Twitpic announced in September that it would be closing down and deleting all the pictures it had hosted—rendering millions of historic tweets meaningless—after a trademark dispute with Twitter. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 2:00 am by Brian Kaszuba
On September 23, 2013, the Landmarks Preservation Commission considered a proposal for two existing buildings and a vacant lot at 38-42 West 18th Street in the Ladies’ Mile Historic District. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Finally, the court rejected CSTI’s additional CEQA challenges, and held that the project description was accurate and stable; that hazardous substance remediation was adequately discussed; that regulatory compliance as mitigation was appropriate; that adding a consultation requirement did not require recirculation; that the EIR contained specific criteria for historic preservation; and that the EIR addressed tidelands protection. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 2:56 pm by lennyesq
Patricia Salkin: As part of the State’s Certified Local Government program for historic preservation (see,http://nysparks.com/shpo/certified-local-governments), the agency has published a model local landmarks preservation law here - http://nysparks.com/shpo/certified-local-governments/documents/ModelLawForLocalGovernments.pdf From Dean Salkin’s Law of the Land Blog *** Related articles Welcome Patricia Salkin To The Lounge (thefacultylounge.org) Touro Law… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:56 am by Hanni Fakhoury
Courts and legislatures in the US are grappling with this “proportionality” principle as they determined whether police are required to obtain a search warrant in order to collect historical cell site information from a cell phone provider. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” In rejecting plaintiff’s remaining arguments, the Court found plaintiff’s analogy between historic resources and biological resources to be inapt: “Plaintiff equates the question whether a project site contains a building that is an historical resource with the question whether a project site contains habitat of an endangered plant or animal and contends that the same standard should be applied to both questions. [read post]