Search for: "v. AT"
Results 801 - 820
of 493,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
If D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V? [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:26 pm
Blue and State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:55 am
Creating Hammer v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:59 pm
McFarling, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
Abbott, and No. 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for effecting the statutory… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:32 am
Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] UKSC 10; [2011] WLR (D) 77 “The special rule attributing causation to multiple defendants in mesothelioma cases also applied to a single defendant who, in breach of duty, exposed a victim to asbestos dust, where her only other known exposure was low level asbestos fibres in the general atmosphere and where she subsequently contracted the disease. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:58 am
Enfield Technical Services Ltd v Payne Grace v B. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:48 am
R v Cottrell; R v Fletcher [2007] EWCA Crim 2016 “The Criminal Cases Review Commission should not normally refer a conviction where the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, would not normally extend time in which to renew an application for leave to appeal against conviction on the basis of a change in the law. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:20 am
Bunney v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:09 am
CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor; Taylor v Stoutt and others [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 57 “There was no difference in principle between the ambit of a solicitor’s duty to the court in relation to the conduct and supervision of disclosure of documents and the conduct and supervision of any redaction of disclosable doccuments prior to inspection. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:07 am
Carvalho v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Omar [2010] EWCA Civ 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 344 “A short term of imprisonment on the part of an EEA worker during his first five years in the United Kingdom meant that the time needed to establish a right permanently to reside had to begin anew after his imprisonment had concluded. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
R (Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Gaines-Cooper) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 83; [2010] WLR (D) 45 “The revenue had not been shown, in considering cases founded upon asserted non-resident status, to have altered its interpretation or application of relevant guidance material. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Court can hear appeal on jurisdiction point Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:44 am
Regina (Saunders) v Independent Police Complaints Commission and Another Regina (Tucker) v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The Independent Police Complaints Commission did not act incompatibly with human rights in not giving a direction to chief officers to prohibit conferring among police officers following a fatal shooting by them. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 10:30 pm
Teleflex Inc., eBay Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:38 pm
Continue reading The post Mendieta Estate v. [read post]
