Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 801 - 820
of 9,903
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2022, 3:55 am
Co. v Morris Assoc., 200 AD2d 728, 730 [2d Dept 1994]; Jones v Archibald, 45 AD2d 532, 535 [4th Dept 1974]; accord Restatement [Third] of Agency § 7.01 [2006]). [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:19 am
In this post, Hannah Jones, Assistant Professional Support Lawyer in the Tax team at CMS, comments on Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd [2022] UKSC 10, a case which concerns the UK’s pre-2014 tax treatment of manufactured overseas dividends. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: The Regulation of Cathedral Property: Economic and Environmental. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:02 pm
In neither Jones v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:01 am
Jones. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm
Discharged home after negative stool culture despite low platelet count with diagnosis of infectious colitis v. inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:52 pm
The bill—introduced in the wake of a leaked Supreme Court draft decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:30 pm
California prohibits the sale of semiautomatic rifles to anyone under 21. [read post]
11 May 2022, 10:34 am
From Judge Ryan Nelson's opinion this morning in Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
Breckon and Jones v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:06 pm
Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 442 (1961); Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:53 am
The case is entitled Jones v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:25 pm
On the question of whether the Qualifications Clause makes Congress the exclusive judge of Section Three ineligibility for congressional candidates, one member of the panel cited Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
Registration for each event is in the links below:Seminar 1: Art, Law and Social Justice (Thursday 26 May 3:00-6:30 pm BST)Pierangelo Blandino (University of Lapland)Through a Legal Lens: Law, History, and Visual CultureElena Cooper (University of Glasgow)Art, Copyright and Justice in the Nineteenth Century: Connecting Abraham Solomon’s ‘Waiting for the Verdict’ and ‘Not Guilty’ (1857) to Graves’ Case (1869)Marcus V. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:14 am
Read the opinion The post WILLIAM NATHANIEL JONES v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
” Jones’ article for the Guardian can be read here and a follow up article here. [read post]