Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 8181 - 8200 of 10,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:23 pm by Alden Abbott
” Accordingly, Judge Brown “conclude[d] the Commission has exceeded its statutory authority in promulgating the [n]on[c]ompete rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Dec. 14,2007) (opinion grantingmotion for stay of execution) ("District Court Opinion"), and is attached to the Application asAppendix B. [read post]
22 May 2016, 2:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Bill C-14, should it become law, will invariably requi [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
: (Chinese Law Prof Blog), China – The intellectual property rights crisis: (Ezine @rticles)   Europe European Court of Justice to consider trade mark questions in Case C-342/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel e.a. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:55 pm
Este Proyecto de Ley, que fue rechazado en forma unánime por la Cámara de  Diputados el pasado 12 de marzo, ha vuelto a la cámara de origen en su Tercer Trámite Constitucional para su rechazo definitivo o aprobación. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
The NJ Senate then took action.Conditional Veto StatementPursuant to Article V, Section I, Paragraph 14 of the New Jersey Constitution, I am returning Senate Bill No. 1967 (First Reprint) with my recommendations for reconsideration. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:50 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Allí se habla de un conjunto de cláusulas que debían votarse en "paquete" por si o por no (el "Núcleo de Coincidencias Básicas" del art. 2º) y otros que podrían reformarse o incluirse (art. 3º). [read post]