Search for: "A. P. G."
Results 8181 - 8200
of 8,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2008, 2:14 pm
Procter & Gamble sued Johnson & Johnson for patent infringement over Listerine Whitening ® Quick Dissolving Strips, marketed as superior to P&G's Crest Whitestrips ®, because they dissolve more quickly. [read post]
4 May 2008, 7:40 am
Under Massachusetts law, an employee has the right to be free from unreasonable, substantial, or serious interference with privacy, as stated in G. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:44 am
[ie, P&G is seeking an injunction; it also wants damages] The IHT reported: The case is one of several lawsuits P&G has filed against competitors in the past year over product, packaging and marketing disputes. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
. $78,950 $116,100 $43,030 $12,500 $250,580 John P. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:43 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:59 am
We can attribute bigorexia to the three G’s: G.I. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:05 am
Gillette and P&G. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 4:51 pm
Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 10:10 am
Lau, P. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:34 am
Yesterday, John P. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:38 pm
Alito, Judge Susan P. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
Pierce County, 166 P.3d 712 (Wash. 2007). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:02 am
Representing Appellee (Defendants): Scott P. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 1 (1979). 19 384 Henry G. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:27 pm
G. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
The Court of Appeal, in the sole judgment of Lord Justice Wilson, found that Sidhu could not be accommodated with the later judgments in Puhlhofer v Hillingdon LBC [1986] AC 484 and R v Brent LBC ex p Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
Importantly, the Act does not specify that such clinicians must be forensic experts, and suggests a risk assessment may still be made even if the offender does not cooperate fully (or at all) in the examination process.Section 8 outlines what these assessment reports must entail: (a) whether the 'offender has a propensity to commit relevant offences in the future'; (b) their 'pattern and progression' of sexual offending, and the 'nature of any likely future sexual… [read post]
