Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 33,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
The country needs to look to California, where a serious measles outbreak at Disneyland led lawmakers to roll back the philosophical and religious exemptions to its vaccination law. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
Which is what the Takings Clause (as well as California law) requires.But the developer says: "It's not right to make me pay that $294,000 fee, because my particular development won't have any kids. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
Additional Resources: Gross v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
A case decided yesterday by the California Court of Appeal, People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
On appeal, defendant argued that California state law only requires a signal if it affected movement of another vehicle. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 8:17 am
When a county sheriff is the country’s chief law enforcement officer, can a plaintiff hold a California County liable under Monell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:15 am
Under California law (comparable to most states' contract law I imagine), ambiguous contracts are interpreted against the drafter. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Kiviat, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, April 22, 2019 Tags: Asset management, Bitcoin, Blockchain, CFTC, Commodities, Commodity Exchange Act, Cryptocurrency, Disclosure, Financial advisers, Financial technology, ICOs, Regulation D, Securities regulation Truth and Bias in M&A Target Fairness Valuations: Appraising the Appraisals Posted by Matthew Shaffer (University of Southern California),… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In order to find a way to force the injured plaintiff into individual (non-class) arbitration, the majority held that California's bedrock common-law rule of contract interpretation, that ambiguities in a contract are construed against the drafter, is preempted by the FAA. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
LP v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
England v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:49 pm
Baseball Associates LLC (April 25, 2019), in which the California Supreme Court clearly discusses the two-stage test for determining whether LMRA preemption under Section 301 applies:Does the claim arise solely from independent state law, or is it based on the collective bargaining agreement (CBA)? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:23 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:54 pm
On April 12, 2019, in a federal case known as Hamilton v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a California jury awarded more than $6 million in meal break premiums to a class of Wal-Mart employees who worked at the company’s fulfillment center in Chino, California. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am
The court also pointed out that the holding was in accordance with long-standing California law. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
Permissive intervention is also appropriate because the U.S. has a claim that shares common questions of law or fact with that of the SEC. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:33 am
See Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:58 am
In Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm
Alfred Seyfarth Synopsis: Today the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in the Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
