Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 8181 - 8200 of 40,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2007, 6:51 am
       Many Americans do not know about Bollywood, but the rest of the world definitely does. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:17 am
Tom, No. 08-2345 District court judgment granting defendant's motion to dismiss petition having have him civilly committed as a sexually dangerous person is reversed where: 1) the court erred in finding the 18 U.S.C. sec. 4248 (the Adam Walsh Act) was an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause, as Congress is empowered by the Commerce Clause to criminalize and punish the conduct of which defendant is guilty and has the ancillary authority… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am by Alex Phipps
Defendant’s appellate counsel then filed an Anders brief and defendant filed arguments on his own. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:38 am by Jeremy Saland
In Zeman, the defendant was convicted after trial of Assault in the Second Degree based, in part, on his use of a broom in the assault on the victim. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The attorney advises her to bring a Workers' Compensation Claim, and does so for her. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:27 pm
In other words, the alleged victim could theoretically have fully consented to the act, and the crime still occurs; 2) The age of the defendant is not described, nor gender. [read post]
At the outset, the District Court noted that the Second Circuit has held that amending a complaint after removal to eliminate class allegations does not deprive a court of jurisdiction under CAFA. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:27 pm
In other words, the alleged victim could theoretically have fully consented to the act, and the crime still occurs; 2) The age of the defendant is not described, nor gender. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:41 am by John Rubin
The presence of alternative offenses with lesser punishments does not necessarily bar prosecution of a more serious offense. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm by mjpetro
We have explained that they are appropriately given to a jury when: (1) a defendant claims a lack of guilty knowledge and (2) the government presents evidence that suggests that the defendant deliberately avoided the truth. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:20 am
Does what the Constitution -- how they take the Constitution, not how our bright legal minds but what they think is important, is it OK to defend yourself in your home if you're under attack? [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:43 am
Third, the number of defendants in Pennsylvania malpractice cases does not play a significant role in increasing or decreasing the insurance premiums paid by doctors and hospitals. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
  Since then the defender has represented himself.[6]        On 2 September 2014 I refused a motion by the defender to discharge the diet of proof. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Jane Chong
Addressing the detainees’ two more minor arguments in brief, the government contends that (1) the panel correctly determined that the defendants were acting within the scope of their employment, such that the United States properly substituted itself for the defendants under the Westfall Act, and that (2) the detainees forfeited any challenge to the dismissal of the “John Doedefendants by failing to raise the claim in… [read post]