Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 8181 - 8200 of 21,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe reports for this blog that the solicitor general’s office has performed an unusual about-face in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:00 pm by Shane Todd
In Merrifield v The Attorney General (2017 ONSC 1333), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said there is a new, freestanding basis to sue for workplace harassment. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
It only came about because every state and territory had Labor governments and the Commonwealth had a strong and determined Liberal attorney-general. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Mack Sperling
  These agreements generally declare that the parties have a "common legal interest" and that they will not waive their attorney-client privilege by exchanging information. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
After considering the issue with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the memorandum said, Kelly was using his own authority to rescind the November 2014 policy guidance. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
Nixon, it does not apply to information related to criminal activity. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Joshua A. Stein
  Based upon this conclusion, Winn-Dixie was ordered to: (i) bring its website into conformance with the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines; (ii) develop and adopt a website accessibility policy (publishing aspects of it upon the website); (iii) provide website accessibility training; (iv) conduct regular ongoing compliance audits; and (v) pay Plaintiff’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” Correctly sensing that what this case really needed was more process, the court called for the views of the solicitor general, who recently weighed in. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1255 Barry Sookman Browsewraps, fair dealing and Blacklock’s Reporter v Canada: a critical commentary com, Inc v Mccants 210 So.3d 761 (CA.Fla.2017) Hite v Lush Internet Inc. 2017 WL 1080906 (D.NJ. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am by Christine Corcos
As regards claim (C), I argue, more specifically, (C1) that Kelsen’s theory of the basic norm offers no solution to (a), because it offers nothing more than normativity from a point of view, and that it is better understood as aiming to solve (b), (C2) that Gerald Postema’s coordination convention account, although in many ways a very fine account, cannot (as Postema is well aware of) generate obligations for the citizens, as distinguished from the legal officials, and (C3) that… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am
As regards claim (C), I argue, more specifically, (C1) that Kelsen’s theory of the basic norm offers no solution to (a), because it offers nothing more than normativity from a point of view, and that it is better understood as aiming to solve (b), (C2) that Gerald Postema’s coordination convention account, although in many ways a very fine account, cannot (as Postema is well aware of) generate obligations for the citizens, as distinguished from the legal officials, and (C3) that… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:55 am by Ken Tanabe
She wrote a letter to Attorney General Robert Kennedy to ask for help. [read post]