Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8181 - 8200 of 16,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
§240(1-b)(h) provides:      (h)  In the event that such agreement or stipulation deviates from the basic child support obligation, the agreement or stipulation must specify the amount that such basic child support obligation would have been and the reason or reasons that such agreement or stipulation does not provide for payment of that amount. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
HauserRobert F.X. and Laura Baudo Sillerman GALA COCHAIRSChristopher H. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Just because the child is raised by same-sex parents does not make this any less true. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:14 am by Stephen Pitel
  Even with this presumption, a framework for analyzing whether there is a real and substantial connection is still required in any case where a defendant seeks to refute the presumption, any case in which a plaintiff is relying on rule 17.02(h) or (o) so that no presumption arises, and any case in which a plaintiff does not rely on 17.02 at all and instead seeks leave of the court to serve a defendant outside Ontario under rule 17.03. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am by tjsllibrary
P301.5.P47 R43 2008 ThomCat The Religious Left and Church-State Relations Steven H. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:15 am
Healy  $ 64,500   $ 15,181      $ 79,681 Glenn H. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:27 pm
 If the below video does not play, you can check it out at: [www.youtube.com]om/watch? [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:25 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
— (h) An action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property that is a one-family to four-familydwelling unit. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
The DOL has long argued that it is entitled to deference under the Chevron doctrine in defending regulations revising minimum wage standards for foreign farmworkers hired through the H-2A temporary visa program, because the INA does not address how those wage standards should be calculated. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
”  Although in use for some time, the I-129 was amended in November 2010 to include a new Part 6 that requires that employers take special measures in hiring a non-U.S. worker under the H-1B (Specialty Occupations), H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore), L-1 (Intracompany Transferee), or O-1 (Extraordinary Ability or Achievement) categories. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:58 am by Mike
Did they violate their ethical duties to the trial court when they alleged that "Judge Jackson granted RAKOFSKY's motion solely because a conflict existed between him and his client and never 'ordered a mistrial' because' [h]e was so incompetent" or for any other reason"? [read post]