Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 16,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2014, 4:46 am
But if you read the decision (H/T – IPKAT), it’s more complicated. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am
But heads up, because that does not apply to §§1.2105(a)(2)(xii) and (c)(6); 1.2204(a), (c), (d)(3), and (d)(5); 1.2205(c) and (d); 1.2209; 2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv); 15.713(h)(10); 27.14(k) and (t)(6); 27.17(c); 27.19(b) and (c); 73.3700(b)(1)(i) through (v), (b)(2)(i) and (ii), (b)(3), (b)(4)(i) and (ii), and (b)(5); 73.3700(c); 73.3700(d); 73.3700(e)(2) through (6); 73.3700(f); 73.3700(g); 73.3700(h)(4) and (6); 74.602(h)(5)(ii) and (iii);… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
In particular, the register court may only reject a list of shareholders that does evidently not comply with the (formal) requirements of sec. 40 GmbHG. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:34 pm
This recall does not impact any other McCormick Ground, Whole or Oregano Leaves products. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
As I wrote in a Verdict column in December 2013, there is a strange tendency even among the most respected sources to call college athletes “unpaid,” because the NCAA does not allow players to receive cash wages or salaries. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:00 pm
An employer does not have to pay for the transportation of an H-1B employee’s family or the shipment of the employee’s possessions. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:30 pm
This recall does not impact any other McCormick Ground, Whole or Oregano Leaves products. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm
In a recent case decided by Suffolk Supreme Court Justice H. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Likewise, the scope of Antelope Valley's right to control the work does not in itself determine whether that right is amenable to common proof.Ayala, 59 Cal. 4th at 534. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:59 pm
Notice 2014-47 scheduled for publication on September 2 by the Department of Treasury (Treasury) will clarify the group health plans exempted from the obligation to pay the temporary risk adjustment fee imposed by Section 9010 of ACA on “covered entities” in IRB 2014-36 will clarify: When a group health plan qualifies as excluded from the general definition of “covered entity” under the exclusions set forth in ACA § 9010(c)(2); and That a controlled group… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:27 pm
Adam Liptak reports on a new paper by Cass Sunstein suggesting that greater unanimity on the Court does not necessarily enhance the legitimacy, stability, or certainty of the law. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:42 am
Even the UNCITRAL Model Law on ICA does not apply Section 27 to foreign arbitrations. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
Does this sound like a court that needs a contrary voice? [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
" Up on H-Net is a review of Robert B. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:42 pm
In some other cases, such as the hardship exemption for the individual mandate, it appears the law does allow the administration to do what it’s done. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
But his right to make most of these statements does not mean I would choose to have him as a colleague. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:01 am
So that the court did what it almost always does suggests nothing at all about the merits, let alone the en-banc-worthiness, of this case. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
The Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) is warning group health insurers third party administrators (TPAs) of self-insured group health plans and to get moving on their preparations to register and conduct required interactions with the EDGE Server that HHS plans to use to collect and administer the data necessary to administer the temporary reinsurance fee and risk adjustment provisions of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:30 am
Robert H. [read post]
