Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 8181 - 8200 of 15,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain in this column, last week’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But access is now potentially on both sides of the equation, not just incentives v. access. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Last week, the Supreme Court Justices struggled to figure out how to apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to the Affordable Care Act in the contraception mandate cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:44 pm
Category: Design Patents    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleMRC Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm
 That's the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.But then Arroyo's survivors figure out what really went down. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple is suing Samsung in California over "slide to unlock", but a little-known Swedish touchscreen phone, the Neonode N1m, already had that feature (though Apple's version undoubtedly has a more elaborate graphical representation) well before the iPhone was launched:For the most part the Apple v. [read post]