Search for: "Ford's Case"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 8,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
[IPBiz notes that Henry Ford's attorney in the Selden matter, Benton Crisp, was made available to Glenn Curtiss to challenge the patent of the Wright Brothers. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:22 am
The ban on discussing Miss Ford's methods has also been lifted.Cases such as this highlight the draconian nature of English (and Irish!) [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:59 am
Lawyers who resist the very notion of electronic discovery often use the "simple" auto accident as an example of a case where electronic discovery is not required. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:11 am
Lawyers who resist the very notion of electronic discovery often use the "simple" auto accident as an example of a case where electronic discovery is not required. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:53 am
That's a clever argument, and it is plainly worth real money to Ford in individual wrongful death cases. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:35 pm
Stevens also described the events leading up to President Ford's announcement that Stevens would be nominated to the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2007, 6:16 am
Ford Motor Co., 142 F.3d 955, 958 (7th Cir. 1998)). [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
Between her and the police car (which was a Ford SUV) were several smaller cars. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
The article also states that Ford Motor Co. may have been spared a monster punitive damages verdict in the SUV rollover case because its lawyer was allowed to tell jurors about the carmaker's financial troubles and recent mass layoffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:34 am
A Superior Court jury in New Brunswick has just recently awarded a $10.6 million personal injury verdict to a Toms River woman who suffered a paralyzed right arm after her 1997 Ford Explorer rolled over. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
Fogelman of Ford & Harrison, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
Ford Motor Co., 2007 N.Y. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:25 am
Ford Ducks Major Punitive Damages in Explorer Rollover Suit Ford Motor Co. may have been spared a monster punitive damages verdict in an SUV rollover case because its lawyer was allowed to tell jurors about the carmaker's dire financial straits and mass layoffs Vague Divorce Settlement Pact May Not Be Construed Against One Side When a divorce property settlement agreement is imprecise as to a key term, the trial… [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Ford v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
Ford v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Huron Valley Steel, Reading Company, and Cooper Industries (the petitioner in a predecessor case, Cooper Industries v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 10:01 pm
Most notably in this case, the jury only awarded $42,500 in punitive damages after a lawyer for Ford was allowed to tell jurors (over the woman's lawyers' objections) of the company's dire financial straits and mass layoffs. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 9:53 am
Perhaps another sign of Ford Motor Company's present perilous financial condition is a New Jersey jury's very modest punitive damages award in an SUV rollover case. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
For awhile there, a case could be made that what was really being sold were not homes, but loans. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:23 am
The New Jersey Law Journal highlights a jury verdict on Wednesday in a major Products Liability case. [read post]
