Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 8181 - 8200 of 76,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
In the same month, the agency ceased accepting any physical correspondence at the height of the third wave of the COVID pandemic in Zambia.The mandatory annual recordal of all trade marks and copyrights for goods imported in Kenya is shaping up. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:14 am by Chijioke Okorie
To remove the goods from the market, the court ordered the defendant to hand over the goods for destruction.May also brought bad news for the applicants in Bata Brands Sa & another v Umoja Rubber Products Limited. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him: “Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:06 pm by Michel-Adrien
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him:"Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:15 pm by Devlin Hartline
On the surface, copyright seems straightforward in that it advances the public good by securing property rights to authors. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That's good for plaintiffs' lawyers, who need to sue someone with "deep pockets" who can pay out a liability judgment. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
In making this finding I draw an adverse inference from Defendant’s failure to initiate litigation against Plaintiff…by November 19, 2018, Defendant was using the DMCA Takedown Notices to suppress a market competitor rather than to enforce a legitimate good faith claim of copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
Section 230(c)(2) prevents the imposition of civil liability on internet service providers on account of (A) “any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected” or (B) “any action taken to enable or make available to [users] the technical… [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:59 am by Christopher J. Willis
  The potential costly impact that such increased scrutiny could have on private litigation is demonstrated by the recent proposed settlement in Lowe v. [read post]