Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 8181 - 8200 of 18,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
Major, [1930] 2 D.L.R. 532 (S.C.C.); Re Teale (1923), 54 O.L.R. 130 (O.S.C.- H.C.D.); and Downey Estate v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:05 am by David Bernstein
 Instead, following this Court’s guidance in  Grutter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:15 pm by Simon Chester
The next case has similarly been certified: Robinson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:16 am by Don Cruse
On that orders list, Justice Guzman noted her dissent to the denial of the motion.) [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:02 am by Woodrow Pollack
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am by Benjamin Beaton
Cat’s paw liability under Title IX – On Thursday, a Sixth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Bose v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” In July, a Reuters analysis concluded that the Court’s emergency orders consistently favored religious groups and Trump’s administration.Findings like that may have contributed to Justice Amy Coney Barrett publicly declaring in September that “we’re not a bunch of partisan hacks. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm by Cory Doctorow
When we're hill-climbing, we're always looking for chances to invoke one of these four forces, or better yet, to combine them. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
He has so far yet to put metaphorical pen to electronic paper to record any thoughts in response to the recent UK Supreme Court decision Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 concerning res judicata (blogged by the IPKat here). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am by David Post
It instructs fact-finders, as the Court put it in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am by Tony Mauro
We're in a series of criminal justice cases, and we're all over the place in education. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Re), 1998 CanLII 837 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, at para. 21; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
[w]ere ambiguous, and the Court d[id] not find that they [we]re”); James T. [read post]