Search for: "In re Doe"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 107,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Will Teamsters' Supreme Court of Canada Employment Law Victory Erode Employee Rights on Termination?
5 May 2008, 3:30 pm
The employer's liability to pay damages for wrongful dismissal during a notice period may be reduced by any income the employee receives (or ought reasonably to have received) during the notice periodHaving said that, when does a wrongfully-dismissed employee have a duty to mitigate damages by accepting an offer of re-employment by his or her former employer? [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
” In re Marriage of Wolff, 355 Ill. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
Bearcat TireIn In re Outsidewall Tire Litigation, 2010 WL 2929626 (E.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:09 pm
An aide to the Homeland Security committee described the bill as one that does not mandate the shuttering of the entire internet. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:12 pm
Here's the EPIC page for Google Buzz: "In re Google Buzz. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Here at our polar vortex bunker in the freezing Nation’s Capital, supplies are running short and we’re vigorously debating whether we should make a mad dash to the Suits by SuitsMobile and drive straight down to visit our colleagues in Tampa, Florida, or just tough it out and pray/chant/hope that the cold will ultimately break. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 4:17 pm
Supreme Court recently clarified the standards under which a worker does (or does not) qualify as a salaried exempt employee for purposes of overtime compensation. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 7:46 pm
However, this does not mean that there is no news at all, nor does it mean that no one is looking into the problem on behalf of the plaintiffs affected by Reglan and its side effect, Tardive Dyskinesia (TD). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm
NOTHING IN THIS BANKRUPTCY BLOG CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE RE A CHAPTER 7, CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 11, OR CHAPTER 12. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 3:18 pm
What does that mean for same-sex couples and estate planning in Ohio, and why does it matter? [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:37 am
The article does not specifically address the problem of retaning women. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Google can't celebrate every anniversary of every thing -- and if it does, then the things that it does celebrate lose their cachet by dilution.Today, for instance, is the seven hundred and ninety-fifth anniversary of Magna Charta. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
One of the problems with the idea that our government should be running health care is that, to some extent, it already does, and does so poorly (cf: VA, Medicare/Medicaid). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:22 pm
You’re not out anything for having asked. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 8:23 am
Not only does he regularly link up to quality sources, but when he does, he usually offers a bit of his own personal commentary. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:31 am
It does? [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:34 pm
However, the Court specifically did not make any determination as to whether it will consider the issue, as both the DOJ and SoundExchange have opposed the Royalty Logic motion as having been filed too late to be considered in this proceeding.Obviously, if the Court does decide to hear the issue, and does decide that the CRB was not properly appointed, the results may fundamentally change the argument - potentially requiring the re-hearing of… [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:47 pm
What does that look like? [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:34 am
But not this case.The post What Does <i>Murthy v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:59 pm
What penalty does Judge Wright impose? [read post]
