Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 29,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:20 pm
This is significant to those who administer public contracts or grants at the state level, for example as a county department or local authority, or as a contractor to such authorities. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
Texas v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:45 pm
The Court in Pickett cited approvingly the language in State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
The Court was also unimpressed by the defendants’ point that other generally indicated facts were truly stated. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 2:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In Farrakhan et al v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:07 am
Alvarez v. 40 Mulberry Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:04 pm
The 6-3 decision in Romer v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
In fact, that is exactly what the state of Louisiana has expressly asked the court to do in June Medical Services v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:53 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm
On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]