Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 39,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2007, 6:16 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle writes today about the Jan. 24th 7th Circuit decision in the Indiana case of Mayer v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:39 am
Medical Justice, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1925 (Admin) (26 July 2010) - Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a fast-track scheme for the removal of failed asylum seekers with little or no notice is unlawful as it does not provide sufficient access to justice. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm
As reported all over the blogosphere yesterday (see here and here for just some of the commentary), the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Adams v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:36 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
Orly Lobel, You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Per Nicolosi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
PrometheusThis was a very interesting discussion, although I was surprised at how little Bilski was mentioned. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
by Dennis Crouch Rafqa Star LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
” Other coverage of the ATA case comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, who also covers Davila for JURIST; Rory Little reports on Davila for this blog. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:42 am
[5] Humphrey v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
But most of us react mildly to a bad picture; we moan a little and move on. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
So, if James is a complete win -- Mardegan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
” The Legal Interests of an Author The court gets so much incorrect in so little time. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
We are discussing Merck v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:53 am
Humane- Society v. [read post]
